H.Raphael Antony Mahesh vs The Managing Director — WP(MD)/15010/2026

Case under Others Section others. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010697452026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/42700/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/15010/2026

Registration Date

03-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.H.Raphael Antony Mahesh

    Adv. D.RAMYA, ,J.SHAKILA,N.SUMITHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Managing Director

  2. 2.General Manager

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed the writ petition filed by H. Raphael Antony Mahesh against Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Thirunelveli) Ltd., directing the respondents to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed payments of Provident Fund, Gratuity, Leave salary, and EL Surrender from the date of retirement until actual payment. The Court noted that the issue was squarely covered by earlier Division Bench judgments and ordered compliance within five months from receipt of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/15010/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed the writ petition filed by H. Raphael Antony Mahesh against Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Thirunelveli) Ltd., directing the respondents to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed payments of Provident Fund, Gratuity, Leave salary, and EL Surrender from the date of retirement until actual payment. The Court noted that the issue was squarely covered by earlier Division Bench judgments and ordered compliance within five months from receipt of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case