R.Janagi vs The Revenue Divisional Officer — WP(MD)/14324/2026
Case under Others Section others. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 20th May 2026.
CNR: HCMD010680972026
Filing Number
WP(MD)/41798/2026
Filing Date
19-05-2026
Registration No
WP(MD)/14324/2026
Registration Date
19-05-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , Honourable Ms.Justice R. POORNIMA
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , Honourable Ms.Justice R. POORNIMA
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Land Acquisition ( 96 )
Sub-Category
Land Encroachment ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
20th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R.Janagi
Adv. KALEESWARAN.K,T.Guru Sundar ,T.Guru Sundar , D.Prithiviraj ,M.Mathankumar ,T.Guru Sundar
Respondent(s)
The Revenue Divisional Officer
The Tahsildar
The Revenue Inspector
Hearing History
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , Honourable Ms.Justice R. POORNIMA
FOR ADMISSION (LAND ENCROACHMENT)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (LAND ENCROACHMENT) |
Orders
Case Summary: WP(MD)/14324/2026 The Madurai Bench disposed of R. Janagi's writ petition challenging a land encroachment notice dated 12.03.2026 under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, finding an effective alternative remedy through appeal to the District Collector. The court granted interim protection by directing the petitioner to file a fresh appeal within two weeks (to be treated as timely), which must be disposed of within three months, with a stay on eviction pending appeal disposal since the land's classification as Natham land was not clearly specified in the impugned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP(MD)/14324/2026 The Madurai Bench disposed of R. Janagi's writ petition challenging a land encroachment notice dated 12.03.2026 under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905, finding an effective alternative remedy through appeal to the District Collector. The court granted interim protection by directing the petitioner to file a fresh appeal within two weeks (to be treated as timely), which must be disposed of within three months, with a stay on eviction pending appeal disposal since the land's classification as Natham land was not clearly specified in the impugned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts