J.Abhimanyu vs The Executive Officer — WP(MD)/14302/2026
Case under Others Section Others. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 20th May 2026.
CNR: HCMD010680812026
Filing Number
WP(MD)/41793/2026
Filing Date
19-05-2026
Registration No
WP(MD)/14302/2026
Registration Date
19-05-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , Honourable Ms.Justice R. POORNIMA
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , Honourable Ms.Justice R. POORNIMA
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Land Acquisition ( 96 )
Sub-Category
Land Encroachment ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
20th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
J.Abhimanyu
Adv. R. SURIYA NARAYANAN,M.RAJESH-MS/2943/2015,M.RAJESH-MS/2943/2015, ,S. SAKTHI SIDDHARTH,LOGESH KUMAR A,M.RAJESH
Respondent(s)
The Executive Officer
The Tahsildhar
Hearing History
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , Honourable Ms.Justice R. POORNIMA
FOR ADMISSION (LAND ENCROACHMENT)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (LAND ENCROACHMENT) |
Orders
The Madurai Bench quashed the Executive Officer's encroachment removal order dated 13.05.2026 for violation of procedural due process under the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998. The court found that no show cause notice was issued before passing the order, as mandated by Section 128(1)(b), and directed the order be treated as a show cause notice with the petitioner given three weeks to submit objections before the respondents issue a reasoned final order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Madurai Bench quashed the Executive Officer's encroachment removal order dated 13.05.2026 for violation of procedural due process under the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998. The court found that no show cause notice was issued before passing the order, as mandated by Section 128(1)(b), and directed the order be treated as a show cause notice with the petitioner given three weeks to submit objections before the respondents issue a reasoned final order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts