N.Balusamy vs The Commissioner — WP(MD)/14307/2026
Case under Others Section Others. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 20th May 2026.
CNR: HCMD010680732026
Filing Number
WP(MD)/41787/2026
Filing Date
19-May-2026
Registration No
WP(MD)/14307/2026
Registration Date
19-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Tenders ( 153 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
20-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.N.Balusamy
Adv. K.MUTHU GANESA PANDIAN,M.MUTHU KAVITHA-MS/4271/2021,M.MUTHU KAVITHA-MS/4271/2021, ,A.VIJAYAKUMAR,M.MUTHU KAVITHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Commissioner
-
2.The Joint Commissioner
-
3.The Assistant Commissioner
-
4.S.Gomathi
-
5.S.Thangavel
-
6.S.Rani
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-May-2026
Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha ChakravarthyView PDF
Case Summary: WP(MD)/14307/2026 N. Balusamy challenged a public auction notice dated 15.05.2026 issued by the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, alleging lack of publicity, irregular reference details, and arbitrary changes in auction amounts. The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court disposed of the petition after the government's Special Pleader undertook to withdraw the impugned notification and issue a fresh notice within 30 days with proper transparency. The court recorded this undertaking and closed the petition with no costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-May-2026
Admission (Tender Cases)
Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy
-
19-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(MD)/14307/2026
Case Summary: WP(MD)/14307/2026 N. Balusamy challenged a public auction notice dated 15.05.2026 issued by the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, alleging lack of publicity, irregular reference details, and arbitrary changes in auction amounts. The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court disposed of the petition after the government's Special Pleader undertook to withdraw the impugned notification and issue a fresh notice within 30 days with proper transparency. The court recorded this undertaking and closed the petition with no costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts