A.V.REV Traders vs The Managing Director — WP(MD)/14338/2026

Case under Others Section others. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

CNR: HCMD010680682026

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/41784/2026

Filing Date

19-05-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/14338/2026

Registration Date

19-05-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tenders ( 153 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Acts & Sections

Others Section others

Petitioner(s)

A.V.REV Traders

Adv. S.SIVAPRAKASH, P.Madhan Kumar ,G.Palanivelmurugan ,M.B.Siva Sankar

Respondent(s)

The Managing Director

The Assistant Manager Store (Disposal)

Hearing History

Judge: Honourable Mr Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

20-05-2026

ADMISSION (TENDER CASES)

11-06-2026

ADMISSION (TENDER CASES)

Orders

20-05-2026
Honourable Mr Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

Case Summary: WP(MD)/14338/2026 A.V.REV Traders challenged a TNSTC scrap auction tender (Reference Mdu/DIS/601, dated 16.05.2026) before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. The petition sought to quash the tender proceedings and direct respondents to allow reasonable time for auction deposit and material lifting without demurrage charges or blacklisting. The court issued notice of motion returnable by 11.06.2026 and permitted respondents to proceed with the auction, but deferred auction confirmation pending the counter-affidavit filing and further court consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(MD)/14338/2026 A.V.REV Traders challenged a TNSTC scrap auction tender (Reference Mdu/DIS/601, dated 16.05.2026) before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. The petition sought to quash the tender proceedings and direct respondents to allow reasonable time for auction deposit and material lifting without demurrage charges or blacklisting. The court issued notice of motion returnable by 11.06.2026 and permitted respondents to proceed with the auction, but deferred auction confirmation pending the counter-affidavit filing and further court consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case