S.Saravanan vs The District Collector — WP(MD)/14322/2026
Case under Others Section Others. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 20th May 2026.
CNR: HCMD010679312026
Filing Number
WP(MD)/41715/2026
Filing Date
19-May-2026
Registration No
WP(MD)/14322/2026
Registration Date
19-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy , Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy , Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Public Interest Litigation ( 128 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
20-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CLOSED
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S.Saravanan
Adv. A.JOEL PAUL ANTONY,S.SHANMUGAM-MS/2521/2018,S.SHANMUGAM-MS/2521/2018, ,S.SHANMUGAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.The District Collector
-
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer
-
3.The Senior Regional Manager
-
4.The District Manager
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-May-2026
Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha CHAKRAVARTHY,Honourable Ms.Justice R. PoornimaView PDF
Case Summary: WP(MD) No. 14322/2026 S. Saravanan sought a Mandamus to compel respondents to complete proceedings (Na.Ka.No.0087/2026/A4) and prevent opening a new TASMAC wine shop at M. Pudhupatti, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District. The court closed the petition after TASMAC's Standing Counsel submitted that there is currently no proposal to locate the shop at the said location, rendering the dispute moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-May-2026
For Admission (Pil)
Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy , Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima
-
19-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(MD)/14322/2026
Case Summary: WP(MD) No. 14322/2026 S. Saravanan sought a Mandamus to compel respondents to complete proceedings (Na.Ka.No.0087/2026/A4) and prevent opening a new TASMAC wine shop at M. Pudhupatti, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District. The court closed the petition after TASMAC's Standing Counsel submitted that there is currently no proposal to locate the shop at the said location, rendering the dispute moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts