Y.Mary Josephine vs The State of Tamilnadu — WP(MD)/14250/2026

Case under Others Section Others. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 20th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010678942026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/41697/2026

Filing Date

19-May-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/14250/2026

Registration Date

19-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Motor Vehicles ( 111 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

20-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section Others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Y.Mary Josephine

    Adv. BEBIN JOSE J,SHAAZIM SHAGAR-MS/3585/2019,SHAAZIM SHAGAR-MS/3585/2019, ,SHAAZIM SHAGAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Tamilnadu

  2. 2.The Regional Transport Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-May-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha ChakravarthyView PDF

    Y. Mary Josephine, a stage carriage permit holder, sought a writ of mandamus to operate buses on a temporary diversion route due to road widening and railway bridge construction works in Kanyakumari District. The court disposed of the petition after the respondents represented that construction work between Nelliyarkonam and Kakadu was completed and no impediment existed for the petitioner to operate buses on the original permitted routes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-May-2026

    Admission (Motor Vehicles)

    Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy

  4. 19-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/14250/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Y. Mary Josephine, a stage carriage permit holder, sought a writ of mandamus to operate buses on a temporary diversion route due to road widening and railway bridge construction works in Kanyakumari District. The court disposed of the petition after the respondents represented that construction work between Nelliyarkonam and Kakadu was completed and no impediment existed for the petitioner to operate buses on the original permitted routes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case