Saravanan M/s.V.Navaneetha Krishnan, ,MOHANDOSS G,B.PRAVIN KUMAR vs The State of Tamil Nadu — HCP(MD)/665/2026

Case under U/a 226 of Constitution of India Section General. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 20th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010677482026

Filing Number

HCP(MD)/26507/2026

Filing Date

19-May-2026

Registration No

HCP(MD)/665/2026

Registration Date

19-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy , Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy , Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Constitution ( 34 )

Sub-Category

Non-Statutory (General) ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

20-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CLOSED

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

U/a 226 of Constitution of India Section General

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Saravanan M/s.V.Navaneetha Krishnan, ,MOHANDOSS G,B.PRAVIN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu

  2. 2.Ram Kumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-May-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha CHAKRAVARTHY,Honourable Ms.Justice R. PoornimaView PDF

    The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dismissed Saravanan's habeas corpus petition seeking the release of his wife, Manimegalai (age 32). The court found that Manimegalai was not in illegal custody but had voluntarily left with the second respondent (Ram Kumar) due to an extramarital affair, having previously returned to the petitioner on 10.04.2026 before leaving again. The court closed the petition while granting the petitioner liberty to pursue matrimonial relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-May-2026

    Admission (Hcp-General)

    Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy , Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

  4. 19-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. HCP(MD)/665/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dismissed Saravanan's habeas corpus petition seeking the release of his wife, Manimegalai (age 32). The court found that Manimegalai was not in illegal custody but had voluntarily left with the second respondent (Ram Kumar) due to an extramarital affair, having previously returned to the petitioner on 10.04.2026 before leaving again. The court closed the petition while granting the petitioner liberty to pursue matrimonial relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case