Rose Darvin vs The Sub Registrar — WP(MD)/14289/2026

Case under Others Section other. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 21st May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010676972026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/41578/2026

Filing Date

19-May-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/14289/2026

Registration Date

19-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Registration ( 132 )

Sub-Category

Registration Act, 1908 (16 of 1908) ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

21-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section other

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rose Darvin

    Adv. S.VISHNUVARDHAN,S.HARSHITHA ,S.HARSHITHA , ,B.AJAYBRABU,MUTHUKUMAR P,DEEPAKSIVA S,S.HARSHITHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Sub Registrar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-May-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha ChakravarthyView PDF

    Summary: WP(MD)/14289/2026 - Rose Darvin v. The Sub Registrar The court allowed Rose Darvin's petition challenging the Sub Registrar's refusal to register a sale deed under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908. Following precedent from Sankarakumar v. Sub-Registrar, the court held that land can be registered without planning authority approval if the parties intend no change of use, provided the claimant executes a notarized affidavit undertaking not to convert the property to residential/commercial use without due permission and accepting liability for contempt if breached. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-May-2026

    Admission (Registration Cases)

    Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy

  4. 20-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 19-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/14289/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: WP(MD)/14289/2026 - Rose Darvin v. The Sub Registrar The court allowed Rose Darvin's petition challenging the Sub Registrar's refusal to register a sale deed under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908. Following precedent from Sankarakumar v. Sub-Registrar, the court held that land can be registered without planning authority approval if the parties intend no change of use, provided the claimant executes a notarized affidavit undertaking not to convert the property to residential/commercial use without due permission and accepting liability for contempt if breached. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case