S.Kannan Poosari vs The District Collector — WP(MD)/14232/2026

Case under Others Section others. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 20th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010676262026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/41562/2026

Filing Date

18-May-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/14232/2026

Registration Date

19-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy , Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy , Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Land Acquisition ( 96 )

Sub-Category

Land Encroachment ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

20-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.Kannan Poosari

    Adv. C.EZHILARASU,C.Vijayalakshmi ,C.Vijayalakshmi , C.Vijayalakshmi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The District Collector

  2. 2.The Tahsildar

  3. 3.The Commissioner

  4. 4.Sundarrajan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-May-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha CHAKRAVARTHY,Honourable Ms.Justice R. PoornimaView PDF

    The Madurai Bench dismissed S. Kannan Poosari's writ petition challenging eviction proceedings. The court held that since the petitioner previously challenged an eviction order (dated 09.05.2024) via WP(MD) No. 11228 of 2024, which was dismissed with liberty to appeal, he cannot now challenge the consequential eviction proceedings without first pursuing that appeal remedy. The court advised the petitioner to file an appeal against the original eviction order if still advised to do so. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-May-2026

    For Admission (Land Encroachment)

    Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy , Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

  4. 18-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/14232/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madurai Bench dismissed S. Kannan Poosari's writ petition challenging eviction proceedings. The court held that since the petitioner previously challenged an eviction order (dated 09.05.2024) via WP(MD) No. 11228 of 2024, which was dismissed with liberty to appeal, he cannot now challenge the consequential eviction proceedings without first pursuing that appeal remedy. The court advised the petitioner to file an appeal against the original eviction order if still advised to do so. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case