S.Balasubramani VIJAY KARTHIKEYAN B, ,ARUNBABU T,S. SANKAR,K. RAMESH DURAI RAJ vs THE STATE TAX OFFICER, — WP(MD)/14254/2026

Case under Others Section other. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 20th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010675822026

e-Filing Number

18-05-2026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/41547/2026

Filing Date

18-May-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/14254/2026

Registration Date

19-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

20-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section other

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.Balasubramani VIJAY KARTHIKEYAN B, ,ARUNBABU T,S. SANKAR,K. RAMESH DURAI RAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE TAX OFFICER,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-May-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha ChakravarthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(MD)/14254/2026 The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a GST assessment order dated 23.02.2026 that sought to impose 18% tax on seigniorage fees of Rs.22,33,970 paid by the petitioner. The court kept the assessment order in abeyance pending the Supreme Court's decision in *Udaipur Chambers of Commerce and Industry v. Union of India* (SLP 37326/2017), which addresses the same taxability issue. The court held that if the Supreme Court rules favorably for revenue, the petitioner may file further appeals; if favorably for the assessee, all proceedings shall be dropped. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-May-2026

    Admission (Tax)

    Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy

  4. 18-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/14254/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(MD)/14254/2026 The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a GST assessment order dated 23.02.2026 that sought to impose 18% tax on seigniorage fees of Rs.22,33,970 paid by the petitioner. The court kept the assessment order in abeyance pending the Supreme Court's decision in *Udaipur Chambers of Commerce and Industry v. Union of India* (SLP 37326/2017), which addresses the same taxability issue. The court held that if the Supreme Court rules favorably for revenue, the petitioner may file further appeals; if favorably for the assessee, all proceedings shall be dropped. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case