Loganathan M/s.R.Sundaraprasath, ,VENKADESH KUMAR R vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Superintendent of Police, Advocate - Public Prosecutor — HCP(MD)/656/2026
Case under U/a 226 of Constitution of India Section General. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 20th May 2026.
CNR: HCMD010675702026
Filing Number
HCP(MD)/26387/2026
Filing Date
18-05-2026
Registration No
HCP(MD)/656/2026
Registration Date
18-05-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , Honourable Ms.Justice R. POORNIMA
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , Honourable Ms.Justice R. POORNIMA
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Constitution ( 34 )
Sub-Category
Non-Statutory (General) ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
20th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Loganathan M/s.R.Sundaraprasath, ,VENKADESH KUMAR R
Respondent(s)
The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Superintendent of Police, Advocate - Public Prosecutor
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Checkanurani
Hearing History
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , Honourable Ms.Justice R. POORNIMA
ADMISSION (HCP-GENERAL)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | ADMISSION (HCP-GENERAL) |
Orders
Summary: HCP(MD) /656/2026 The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition filed by Loganathan seeking the release of his foster son Sankar Ganesh. The court found that the case involved a financial dispute between father and son—where the petitioner entrusted money to his son who subsequently disappeared—and did not involve illegal custody, making habeas corpus an inappropriate remedy. The petitioner was directed to pursue civil remedies available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: HCP(MD) /656/2026 The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition filed by Loganathan seeking the release of his foster son Sankar Ganesh. The court found that the case involved a financial dispute between father and son—where the petitioner entrusted money to his son who subsequently disappeared—and did not involve illegal custody, making habeas corpus an inappropriate remedy. The petitioner was directed to pursue civil remedies available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts