Saisamary alias Jayanthi vs The District Collector — WP(MD)/14196/2026

Case under Others Section other. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 20th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010673532026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/41472/2026

Filing Date

18-May-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/14196/2026

Registration Date

18-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy , Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy , Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Township ( 156 )

Sub-Category

Un-Authorised Constructions ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

20-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section other

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Saisamary alias Jayanthi

    Adv. R. UDHAYAKUMAR,D.AZHAGUMALAI ,D.AZHAGUMALAI , D.AZHAGUMALAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The District Collector

  2. 2.The Commissioner

  3. 3.The District Town and Country Planning Officer (DTCP),

  4. 4.The Assistant Director,

  5. 5.The Thasildhar,

  6. 6.The Executive Engineer,

  7. 7.The Town Planning Officer,

  8. 8.The Block Development Officer,

  9. 9.The Superintending Engineer,

  10. 10.The Assistant Executive Engineer (AEE),

  11. 11.Banumathi,

  12. 12.Rajasekaran,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-May-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha CHAKRAVARTHY,Honourable Ms.Justice R. PoornimaView PDF

    The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition at the admission stage, holding that since the petitioner claims the disputed land belongs to her and private respondents have encroached it, she cannot seek demolition of unauthorized construction on her own property through administrative action. The court reasoned that the property ownership dispute is already pending in a civil appeal (A.S.No.51 of 2025) before the Subordinate Judge, making the matter sub-judice; therefore, the writ petition cannot be entertained. The court requested the civil court to expeditiously dispose of the pending appeal within four months, noting the petitioner's elderly status and litigation hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-May-2026

    For Admission (Un-Authorised Constructions)

    Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy , Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

  4. 18-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/14196/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition at the admission stage, holding that since the petitioner claims the disputed land belongs to her and private respondents have encroached it, she cannot seek demolition of unauthorized construction on her own property through administrative action. The court reasoned that the property ownership dispute is already pending in a civil appeal (A.S.No.51 of 2025) before the Subordinate Judge, making the matter sub-judice; therefore, the writ petition cannot be entertained. The court requested the civil court to expeditiously dispose of the pending appeal within four months, noting the petitioner's elderly status and litigation hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case