Manikandan vs G.Palani Velu — CMP(MD)/9631/2025

Case under U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 1683. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED ON CONDITION on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010671742025

Filing Number

CMP(MD)/46797/2025

Filing Date

09-Jun-2025

Registration No

CMP(MD)/9631/2025

Registration Date

24-Jun-2025

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice P.vadamalai

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice P.vadamalai

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED ON CONDITION

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 1683

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manikandan

    Adv. V. RAMAKRISHNAN,K.GUHAN-MS/1680/2002,K.GUHAN-MS/1680/2002, ,K.GUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.G.Palani Velu

    Adv. M/S.AJMAL ASSOCIATES ,V.GEORGE RAJA ,M.MOHAMED IBRAM SAIBU ,FOR SOLE RESPONDENT SR 39717 DT 23.09.2025,COUNTER AFFIDAVIT FILED USR. 2623 DT 21.01.2026,TYPED SET FILED USR. 2624 DT 21.01.2026 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice P.vadamalaiView PDF

    The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed the petitioner's petition to condone a delay of 2,123 days in representing a review application, finding that the review petition was filed within the prescribed time limit and the delay was only in representation due to advocate's office relocation. The court imposed a condition requiring the petitioner to pay ₹25,000 as cost to the respondent by 27.04.2026 as compensation for inconvenience caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Feb-2026

    Part Heard Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice P.vadamalai

  4. 05-Feb-2026

    Miscellaneous Petitions

    Honourable Mr Justice P.vadamalai

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    Miscellaneous Petitions

    Honourable Mr Justice P.vadamalai

  6. 12-Aug-2025

    Miscellaneous Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan

  7. 08-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP(MD)/9631/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed the petitioner's petition to condone a delay of 2,123 days in representing a review application, finding that the review petition was filed within the prescribed time limit and the delay was only in representation due to advocate's office relocation. The court imposed a condition requiring the petitioner to pay ₹25,000 as cost to the respondent by 27.04.2026 as compensation for inconvenience caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case