K.Sundaravel vs The Commissioner, — WP(MD)/14476/2026

Case under Others Section others. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010645792026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/40030/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/14476/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.Sundaravel

    Adv. S.LOUIS,I.Anthony Prabu ,I.Anthony Prabu , F.L.M.Gilda,K.Thirumal Samy ,V.Sadeesh Kumar ,I.Anthony Prabu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Commissioner,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    The Madras High Court disposed of the writ petition, directing Thoothukudi City Municipal Corporation to consider K. Sundaravel's representation dated 09.10.2025 regarding delayed terminal benefits and interest on General Provident Fund within eight weeks. The court ordered that any amounts found due be paid expeditiously, without adjudicating the merits after the respondent's counsel undertook to process the representation in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/14476/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court disposed of the writ petition, directing Thoothukudi City Municipal Corporation to consider K. Sundaravel's representation dated 09.10.2025 regarding delayed terminal benefits and interest on General Provident Fund within eight weeks. The court ordered that any amounts found due be paid expeditiously, without adjudicating the merits after the respondent's counsel undertook to process the representation in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case