R.Jeganathan vs The Managing Director — WP(MD)/14027/2026
Case under Others Section others. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st June 2026.
CNR: HCMD010632552026
Filing Number
WP(MD)/39170/2026
Filing Date
27-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP(MD)/14027/2026
Registration Date
29-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
Coram
Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Service ( 140 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
01-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.R.Jeganathan
Adv. K.GOKUL, J.Sulaiman Basha ,D.Meenalochini ,M.FERNAND,M.Srinivasan ,B.Dhinakaran
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Managing Director
-
2.The General Manager
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF
Summary of WP(MD)/14027/2026 The Madurai Bench allowed R. Jeganathan's writ petition seeking benefits under the 15th Wage Settlement (dated 29.05.2025) from Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation. The court directed the respondents to revise the petitioner's pay scale with effect from 01.09.2023 and provide all consequential monetary benefits from 01.09.2024 as per the settlement, with arrears payable within five months along with 6% per annum interest for belated payment. The decision followed an identical precedent from a coordinate bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(MD)/14027/2026
Summary of WP(MD)/14027/2026 The Madurai Bench allowed R. Jeganathan's writ petition seeking benefits under the 15th Wage Settlement (dated 29.05.2025) from Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation. The court directed the respondents to revise the petitioner's pay scale with effect from 01.09.2023 and provide all consequential monetary benefits from 01.09.2024 as per the settlement, with arrears payable within five months along with 6% per annum interest for belated payment. The decision followed an identical precedent from a coordinate bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts