J.Then Rajan vs The District Collector — WP(MD)/13432/2026
Case under Others Section others. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 29th April 2026.
CNR: HCMD010629412026
Filing Number
WP(MD)/38954/2026
Filing Date
27-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP(MD)/13432/2026
Registration Date
28-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Mrs Justice S.srimathy
Coram
Honourable Mrs Justice S.srimathy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Land Ceiling/Reforms/Disputes/Abolitions and Conversion/Encroachment ( 97 )
Sub-Category
The Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Act (4 of 1986) ( 19 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.J.Then Rajan
Adv. HAJA MOHIDEEN A,SK.Pavithra ,SK.Pavithra , M.Abdul Javith Akthar ,M.Mohamed Mustafa Haris ,SK.Pavithra
Respondent(s)
-
1.The District Collector
-
2.The District Revenue Officer
-
3.The Sub-Collector
-
4.The Tahsildar
-
5.The Assistant Director of Survey and Settlement,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF
The court corrected typographical errors in its previous order dated 29.04.2026. The petitioner's application had already been approved by competent authorities, and the Sub-Collector directed revenue officials to modify computerized records, but the changes were not implemented. The court directed the District Revenue Officer (second respondent) to make necessary modifications and upload them to the computer system within one month from receipt of the corrected order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Honourable Mrs Justice S.srimathyView PDF
-
29-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Apr-2026
Revoked
Honourable Mrs Justice S.srimathy
-
27-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(MD)/13432/2026
The court corrected typographical errors in its previous order dated 29.04.2026. The petitioner's application had already been approved by competent authorities, and the Sub-Collector directed revenue officials to modify computerized records, but the changes were not implemented. The court directed the District Revenue Officer (second respondent) to make necessary modifications and upload them to the computer system within one month from receipt of the corrected order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts