M. Velayutham, vs The Managing Director — WP(MD)/13692/2026

Case under Others Section othres. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010617732026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/38217/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/13692/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section othres

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M. Velayutham,

    Adv. K.GOKUL, ,J SULAIMAN BASHA,MEENALOCHINI D,B.DHINAKARAN,M.SRINIVASAN,M.FERNAND

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Managing Director

  2. 2.The General Manager

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    Summary of WP(MD) No.13692 of 2026 The Madras High Court allowed M. Velayutham's petition against Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, directing the respondents to revise the petitioner's pay scale effective 01.09.2023 and provide monetary benefits from 01.09.2024 under the 15th Wage Settlement dated 29.05.2025. The court ordered payment of all arrears with 6% per annum interest within five months, following an identical precedent that established employees entitled to benefits under the settlement must receive consequential payments even if retired before monetary benefits took effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/13692/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP(MD) No.13692 of 2026 The Madras High Court allowed M. Velayutham's petition against Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, directing the respondents to revise the petitioner's pay scale effective 01.09.2023 and provide monetary benefits from 01.09.2024 under the 15th Wage Settlement dated 29.05.2025. The court ordered payment of all arrears with 6% per annum interest within five months, following an identical precedent that established employees entitled to benefits under the settlement must receive consequential payments even if retired before monetary benefits took effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case