Geetha Devi vs Indhurani (Died) 1. Prabhu Rengarajan, Advocate - MUTHUVIJAYAPANDIAN P, CAVEATOR (T/E) — CMP(MD)/7337/2026

Case under U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 4. Disposed: Uncontested--ORDERED on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010595702026

Filing Number

CMP(MD)/36809/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

CMP(MD)/7337/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ORDERED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Geetha Devi

    Adv. R. SURIYA NARAYANAN,M.RAJESH-MS/2943/2015,M.RAJESH-MS/2943/2015, ,LOGESH KUMAR A,M.RAJESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Indhurani (Died) 1. Prabhu Rengarajan, Advocate - MUTHUVIJAYAPANDIAN P, CAVEATOR (T/E)

  2. 2.Kanchanadevi

  3. 3.Vennila

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice P.B. BalajiView PDF

    The court allowed Geetha Devi's petition to condone a 515-day delay in re-presenting a Second Appeal. Judge P.B. Balaji found that the petitioner had established sufficient cause for the delay after reviewing the supporting affidavit and hearing counsel. The Registry was directed to register the Second Appeal if otherwise procedurally compliant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Miscellaneous Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP(MD)/7337/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Geetha Devi's petition to condone a 515-day delay in re-presenting a Second Appeal. Judge P.B. Balaji found that the petitioner had established sufficient cause for the delay after reviewing the supporting affidavit and hearing counsel. The Registry was directed to register the Second Appeal if otherwise procedurally compliant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case