The Branch Manager, vs Vellaiyammal, — CMP(MD)/6255/2026

Case under U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 4. Disposed: Uncontested--ORDERED on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010595132026

Filing Number

CMP(MD)/36761/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

CMP(MD)/6255/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice K.murali Shankar

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice K.murali Shankar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ORDERED

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Branch Manager,

    Adv. ROBERT CHANDRA KUMAR I,M.Venkatesh,M.Venkatesh, ,K.S. GUKANESAN,M.Venkatesh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vellaiyammal,

  2. 2.Raman,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice K.murali ShankarView PDF

    The court granted the petitioner's request to condone a 150-day delay in filing an appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award dated 26.03.2025. The court, after hearing counsel and reviewing records, found the reasons assigned and quantum of delay sufficient to warrant condonation. The Registry was directed to register the appeal and proceed with listing in the usual course, subject to all other procedural requirements being satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Miscellaneous Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice K.murali Shankar

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP(MD)/6255/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the petitioner's request to condone a 150-day delay in filing an appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award dated 26.03.2025. The court, after hearing counsel and reviewing records, found the reasons assigned and quantum of delay sufficient to warrant condonation. The Registry was directed to register the appeal and proceed with listing in the usual course, subject to all other procedural requirements being satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case