Jeyakumar.K vs The Government of Tamil Nadu — CMP(MD)/6073/2026
Case under U/s 5 Limitation Act Section 1684. Disposed: Uncontested--ORDERED on 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCMD010593892026
Filing Number
CMP(MD)/36676/2026
Filing Date
21-04-2026
Registration No
CMP(MD)/6073/2026
Registration Date
29-04-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice N. SATHISH KUMAR , Honourable Mr.Justice M.JOTHIRAMAN
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice N. SATHISH KUMAR , Honourable Mr.Justice M.JOTHIRAMAN
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Service ( 140 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
08th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ORDERED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jeyakumar.K
Adv. S.RAMSUNDARVIJAYRAJ,Saravanakumar.P,Saravanakumar.P, Saravanakumar.P
Respondent(s)
The Government of Tamil Nadu
The Director/Commissioner
The Regional Joint Director of Training
The Deputy Director/Principal
Hearing History
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice N. SATHISH KUMAR , Honourable Mr.Justice M.JOTHIRAMAN
TO CONDONE DELAY IN FILING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | TO CONDONE DELAY IN FILING |
Orders
The Madras High Court granted Jeyakumar.K's petition to condone a 144-day delay in filing a writ appeal against the Government of Tamil Nadu and training officials. The court accepted the reasons stated in the supporting affidavit, with the State counsel raising no serious objections, and directed the Registry to number the appeal if other procedural requirements were met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Madras High Court granted Jeyakumar.K's petition to condone a 144-day delay in filing a writ appeal against the Government of Tamil Nadu and training officials. The court accepted the reasons stated in the supporting affidavit, with the State counsel raising no serious objections, and directed the Registry to number the appeal if other procedural requirements were met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts