G.Balu vs The Managing Director — WP(MD)/13993/2026

Case under Others Section others. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010560212026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/34470/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/13993/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.G.Balu

    Adv. K.GOKUL, J.Sulaiman Basha ,D.Meenalochini ,B.Dhinakaran ,M.Srinivasan ,M.FERNAND

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Managing Director

  2. 2.The General Manager

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(MD) /13993/2026 Court Decision: The Madurai Bench allowed G. Balu's writ petition, directing Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation to permit him to encash 135 days of earned leave accumulated during 2011-2024 and disburse the amount with 6% per annum interest from superannuation date, within five months. Key Reasoning: Following identical precedent rulings (WP(MD) No.2449 of 2018, confirmed by Division Bench in 2019), the court held that employees are entitled to encash earned leave under the Section 12(3) Industrial Disputes Act settlement, despite the corporation's financial crisis. The petitioner's entitlement cannot be denied merely because he was prevented from encashing leave earlier due to the corporation's financial constraints. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/13993/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(MD) /13993/2026 Court Decision: The Madurai Bench allowed G. Balu's writ petition, directing Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation to permit him to encash 135 days of earned leave accumulated during 2011-2024 and disburse the amount with 6% per annum interest from superannuation date, within five months. Key Reasoning: Following identical precedent rulings (WP(MD) No.2449 of 2018, confirmed by Division Bench in 2019), the court held that employees are entitled to encash earned leave under the Section 12(3) Industrial Disputes Act settlement, despite the corporation's financial crisis. The petitioner's entitlement cannot be denied merely because he was prevented from encashing leave earlier due to the corporation's financial constraints. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case