Ganthaiah vs The Commissioner — WP(MD)/10701/2026

Case under Others Section other. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010522862026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/32084/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/10701/2026

Registration Date

15-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Local Authorities ( 103 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section other

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ganthaiah

    Adv. KARUPPU SAMY,V.KAMALAKANNAN ,V.KAMALAKANNAN , ,MERLINRUBA K,KONGESWARAJEEVA C,V.KAMALAKANNAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Commissioner

  2. 2.The Assistant Commissioner,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant ChandangoudarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(MD)/10701/2026 - Ganthaiah v. The Commissioner, Tirunelveli Corporation The Madurai High Court allowed Ganthaiah's writ petition seeking to enforce a Supreme Court directive fixing shop lease rates at Rs.140 per sq.ft. monthly. The court directed Tirunelveli Corporation to refix rent at the mandated rate instead of the demanded Rs.225 per sq.ft., and to adjust any excess rental amounts collected from the petitioner between January 2022 and May 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/10701/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(MD)/10701/2026 - Ganthaiah v. The Commissioner, Tirunelveli Corporation The Madurai High Court allowed Ganthaiah's writ petition seeking to enforce a Supreme Court directive fixing shop lease rates at Rs.140 per sq.ft. monthly. The court directed Tirunelveli Corporation to refix rent at the mandated rate instead of the demanded Rs.225 per sq.ft., and to adjust any excess rental amounts collected from the petitioner between January 2022 and May 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case