Senthil Kumar VARUN PANDIAN, Shanmathi.U,Rajeshkumar.R,Balaji.P vs Income Tax Assessment Unit — WP(MD)/10662/2026

Case under Others Section Others. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

Next hearing 01-Jun-2026

CNR: HCMD010518032026

e-Filing Number

07-04-2026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/31803/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/10662/2026

Registration Date

15-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Income Tax ( 87 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section Others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Senthil Kumar VARUN PANDIAN, Shanmathi.U,Rajeshkumar.R,Balaji.P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Income Tax Assessment Unit

    Adv. M/s. N.DILIP KUMAR - 1978/02 (CENTRAL GOVT. ST. COUNSEL FOR INCOME TAX),MEMO OF APPEARANCE FILED FOR R1 TO R3 1123

  2. 2.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax

  3. 3.The Income Tax Officer

Case History

  1. 01-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Admission (Income Tax)

    Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha ChakravarthyView PDF

    Case Summary: The court identified that in the impugned income tax assessment order, authorities failed to consider the petitioners' substantive reply on merits regarding a Section 143 notice inquiry. Instead, authorities only acknowledged the initial response mentioning a pending writ petition and subsequently dismissed it, entirely disregarding the merit-based reply filed. The court adjourned the matter to 01.06.2026, directing counsel to obtain instructions on the specific aspect for filing a comprehensive counter response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/10662/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The court identified that in the impugned income tax assessment order, authorities failed to consider the petitioners' substantive reply on merits regarding a Section 143 notice inquiry. Instead, authorities only acknowledged the initial response mentioning a pending writ petition and subsequently dismissed it, entirely disregarding the merit-based reply filed. The court adjourned the matter to 01.06.2026, directing counsel to obtain instructions on the specific aspect for filing a comprehensive counter response. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case