A.Mareeswaran vs The Managing Director — WP(MD)/10400/2026

Case under Others Section Others. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010514512026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/31566/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/10400/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section Others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A.Mareeswaran

    Adv. JEEVAN MOORTHY B,S.Elangovan ,S.Elangovan , S.Shalini ,S.Elangovan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Managing Director

  2. 2.The Administrator,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed the writ petition and directed Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed terminal benefits payment from the petitioner's retirement date until actual payment. The court based its decision on earlier Division Bench judgments covering the same issue and ordered compliance within five months from receipt of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Admission (Transport - Interest Matters)

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/10400/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed the writ petition and directed Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed terminal benefits payment from the petitioner's retirement date until actual payment. The court based its decision on earlier Division Bench judgments covering the same issue and ordered compliance within five months from receipt of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case