D.Ravichandran vs The Managing Director — WP(MD)/10387/2026

Case under Others Section other. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010514452026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/31560/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/10387/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section other

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.D.Ravichandran

    Adv. JEEVAN MOORTHY B,S.ELANGOVAN ,S.ELANGOVAN , S.SHALINI ,S.ELANGOVAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Managing Director

  2. 2.The Administrator,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed D. Ravichandran's petition and directed Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation and the Pension Fund Trust to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed terminal benefits payment from his retirement date until actual payment. The respondents must comply within five months from receiving the court order, relying on established precedent from earlier Division Bench decisions on the same issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Admission (Transport - Interest Matters)

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/10387/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed D. Ravichandran's petition and directed Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation and the Pension Fund Trust to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed terminal benefits payment from his retirement date until actual payment. The respondents must comply within five months from receiving the court order, relying on established precedent from earlier Division Bench decisions on the same issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case