K.Vijayakumar vs State Express Transport Corporation Tamil Nadu Limited — WP(MD)/10556/2026
Case under Others Section other. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 16th April 2026.
CNR: HCMD010514052026
Filing Number
WP(MD)/31533/2026
Filing Date
08-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP(MD)/10556/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
Coram
Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Service ( 140 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.K.Vijayakumar
Adv. D.SIVA RAMAN,A.Balaji ,A.Balaji , A.Balaji
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Express Transport Corporation Tamil Nadu Limited
-
2.The General Manager,
-
3.The Chief Financial Officer,
-
4.Assistant Manager,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF
Case Summary: WP(MD) 10556/2026 The Madurai Bench allowed K. Vijayakumar's petition seeking interest on delayed retirement benefits from State Express Transport Corporation Tamil Nadu Limited. The court directed the respondents to pay 6% per annum interest (rather than the 18% requested) on the delayed payment of gratuity, provident fund, and earned leave salary from retirement until actual payment, citing established precedents from prior Division Bench judgments. Compliance was ordered within five months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
For Admission (Transport - Interest Matters)
Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
-
08-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(MD)/10556/2026
Case Summary: WP(MD) 10556/2026 The Madurai Bench allowed K. Vijayakumar's petition seeking interest on delayed retirement benefits from State Express Transport Corporation Tamil Nadu Limited. The court directed the respondents to pay 6% per annum interest (rather than the 18% requested) on the delayed payment of gratuity, provident fund, and earned leave salary from retirement until actual payment, citing established precedents from prior Division Bench judgments. Compliance was ordered within five months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts