K.Ilankamban vs The Managing Director — WP(MD)/10271/2026

Case under Others Section others. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010512942026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/31464/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/10271/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.Ilankamban

    Adv. GOVINDAN S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Managing Director

  2. 2.The General Manager

  3. 3.The Administrator

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed the writ petition filed by K. Ilankamban against Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, directing respondents to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed retirement benefits (provident fund, gratuity, leave salary, and commutation) from retirement date (30.06.2025) until payment. The court based its decision on established precedents and directed compliance within five months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Admission (Transport - Interest Matters)

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/10271/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed the writ petition filed by K. Ilankamban against Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, directing respondents to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed retirement benefits (provident fund, gratuity, leave salary, and commutation) from retirement date (30.06.2025) until payment. The court based its decision on established precedents and directed compliance within five months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case