Muralitharan N vs The Managing Director — WP(MD)/10184/2026

Case under Others Section Others. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010507792026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/31194/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/10184/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section Others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Muralitharan N

    Adv. D.RAMYA, ,N.SUMITHA,J.SHAKILA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Managing Director

  2. 2.The Administrator

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    Summary The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed the petitioner's writ petition and directed the State Express Transport Corporation and the Pension Fund Trust to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed gratuity, provident fund, earned leave surrender, and leave salary from the date of retirement until actual payment. The court's decision was based on settled law established by prior Division Bench judgments, and the respondents were ordered to comply within five months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Admission (Transport - Interest Matters)

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/10184/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed the petitioner's writ petition and directed the State Express Transport Corporation and the Pension Fund Trust to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed gratuity, provident fund, earned leave surrender, and leave salary from the date of retirement until actual payment. The court's decision was based on settled law established by prior Division Bench judgments, and the respondents were ordered to comply within five months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case