Gopinathan D vs The Managing Director — WP(MD)/10481/2026

Case under Others Section Others. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010501802026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/30826/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/10481/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section Others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gopinathan D

    Adv. D.RAMYA, ,N.SUMITHA,J.SHAKILA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Managing Director

  2. 2.The Administrator

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    The Madurai High Court allowed D. Gopinathan's writ petition and directed the State Express Transport Corporation and the Pension Fund Trust to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed retirement benefits (gratuity, provident fund, pension commutation, EL surrender, and leave salary) from retirement until actual payment. The respondents were ordered to comply within five months, as the issue was settled under established precedent judgments from the Division Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    For Admission (Transport - Interest Matters)

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/10481/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madurai High Court allowed D. Gopinathan's writ petition and directed the State Express Transport Corporation and the Pension Fund Trust to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed retirement benefits (gratuity, provident fund, pension commutation, EL surrender, and leave salary) from retirement until actual payment. The respondents were ordered to comply within five months, as the issue was settled under established precedent judgments from the Division Bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case