GAIL (India) Limited Joseph Prabakar, S VAISHNAVI,I JANNATHUL FATHIMA,V VASANTHY,T SRI SIVA DARSHINI vs Commercial Tax Officer — WP(MD)/10982/2026
Case under Others Section others. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th April 2026.
CNR: HCMD010497442026
e-Filing Number
31-03-2026
Filing Number
WP(MD)/30492/2026
Filing Date
06-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP(MD)/10982/2026
Registration Date
16-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Tax/Tolls ( 150 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 26-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GAIL (India) Limited Joseph Prabakar, S VAISHNAVI,I JANNATHUL FATHIMA,V VASANTHY,T SRI SIVA DARSHINI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Commercial Tax Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha ChakravarthyView PDF
Case Summary: WP(MD)/10982/2026 The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted GAIL (India) Limited's writ petition seeking expeditious hearing of its appeal pending before the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal. The court directed the Tribunal to consider and dispose of the appeal (T.A.No.14 of 2024) within four months from receipt of the court's order, without requiring a certified copy. The petition was disposed at the admission stage given the limited and non-contentious nature of the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
For Admission
Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy
-
15-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha ChakravarthyView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(MD)/10982/2026
Case Summary: WP(MD)/10982/2026 The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted GAIL (India) Limited's writ petition seeking expeditious hearing of its appeal pending before the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal. The court directed the Tribunal to consider and dispose of the appeal (T.A.No.14 of 2024) within four months from receipt of the court's order, without requiring a certified copy. The petition was disposed at the admission stage given the limited and non-contentious nature of the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts