K.Arjunan vs The Managing Director — WP(MD)/10550/2026

Case under Others Section others. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010474832026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/29104/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/10550/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.Arjunan

    Adv. SP.VIJAYNIVAS,S. SANKAR-MS/1164/2011,S. SANKAR-MS/1164/2011, ,S. SANKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Managing Director

  2. 2.The General Manager,

  3. 3.The Administrator,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    Summary of WP(MD) No.10550 of 2026 The Madurai Bench allowed K. Arjunan's petition seeking 6% interest on delayed retirement benefits from Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation. The court directed respondents to pay interest at 6% per annum from the petitioner's retirement date (30.06.2025) until actual payment (11.03.2026), relying on established Division Bench precedents. Compliance was ordered within five months from receipt of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    For Admission (Transport - Interest Matters)

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/10550/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP(MD) No.10550 of 2026 The Madurai Bench allowed K. Arjunan's petition seeking 6% interest on delayed retirement benefits from Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation. The court directed respondents to pay interest at 6% per annum from the petitioner's retirement date (30.06.2025) until actual payment (11.03.2026), relying on established Division Bench precedents. Compliance was ordered within five months from receipt of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case