K.Seenivasan vs The Managing Director — WP(MD)/10436/2026

Case under Others Section other. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010458842026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/28084/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/10436/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section other

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.Seenivasan

    Adv. N.SUMITHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Managing Director

  2. 2.The General Manager

  3. 3.The Administrator,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(MD) 10436/2026 K. Seenivasan v. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation The Madurai High Court allowed the petition and directed Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation to revise the petitioner's pay scale with effect from 01.09.2023 and provide all consequential monetary benefits from 01.09.2024 as per the 15th Wage Settlement dated 29.05.2025, with arrears payable within five months plus 6% interest per annum for belated payment. The court relied on an identical earlier order applying the same settlement provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/10436/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(MD) 10436/2026 K. Seenivasan v. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation The Madurai High Court allowed the petition and directed Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation to revise the petitioner's pay scale with effect from 01.09.2023 and provide all consequential monetary benefits from 01.09.2024 as per the 15th Wage Settlement dated 29.05.2025, with arrears payable within five months plus 6% interest per annum for belated payment. The court relied on an identical earlier order applying the same settlement provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case