Balakrishnan M/s. S. Sades Kumar, ,R.SHUNMATHI PRIYA,V.Gowtham,ADDITIONAL TYPED SET FILED DT 09/01/2026 USR1675 vs Parameshwari — SA(MD)/630/2025
Case under U/s 100 of C.p.c Section 1659. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.
CNR: HCMD010455572023
Filing Number
SA(MD)/29616/2023
Filing Date
17-Apr-2023
Registration No
SA(MD)/630/2025
Registration Date
16-Dec-2025
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Suits ( 149 )
Sub-Category
Permanent Injunction ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 14-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Balakrishnan M/s. S. Sades Kumar, ,R.SHUNMATHI PRIYA,V.Gowtham,ADDITIONAL TYPED SET FILED DT 09/01/2026 USR1675
Respondent(s)
-
1.Parameshwari
Adv. R.RAJA,A.ABDUL HAMEED FOR SOLE RESPONDENT (IN SR STAGE) 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr Justice P.B. BalajiView PDF
Court Summary The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dismissed the defendant's second appeal, upholding lower court judgments that found the defendant unlawfully encroached onto the plaintiff's property (Schedule C) by constructing a building and laying drainage pipes in March 2017, after having sold the land to the plaintiff in 1995. The court rejected the defendant's arguments that the suit lacked proper property description and that mandatory injunction without recovery of possession was unmaintainable, holding that the plaintiff adequately established ownership and entitlement to the injunction relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Adjourned Admission
Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji
-
12-Jan-2026
For Admission
Honourable Mr Justice K.murali Shankar
-
05-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. SA(MD)/630/2025
Court Summary The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dismissed the defendant's second appeal, upholding lower court judgments that found the defendant unlawfully encroached onto the plaintiff's property (Schedule C) by constructing a building and laying drainage pipes in March 2017, after having sold the land to the plaintiff in 1995. The court rejected the defendant's arguments that the suit lacked proper property description and that mandatory injunction without recovery of possession was unmaintainable, holding that the plaintiff adequately established ownership and entitlement to the injunction relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts