Superintending Engineer vs Piramatchi — CMP(MD)/4940/2026

Case under U/s 5 Limitation Act Section 1684. Disposed: Contested--ORDERED on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010449082026

Filing Number

CMP(MD)/27497/2026

Filing Date

26-Mar-2026

Registration No

CMP(MD)/4940/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ORDERED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 5 Limitation Act Section 1684

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Superintending Engineer

    Adv. B.RAMANATHAN,B. BABU-MS/378/1998,B. BABU-MS/378/1998, ,B. BABU

  2. 2.Assistant Executive Engineer

  3. 3.The Chairman

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Piramatchi

    Adv. R3 & R4 - TAPAL RETURNED - INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS,R2 - K.M.A.NIJAM,R1 - PIRAMATCHI,-----------,PVT. NOTICE - PROOF FILED,R1 TO R4 - SERVICE AWAITED,---------------,COURT NOTICE,MEMO OF APPEARANCE FOR R5 SR.21142 DT.18.06.2026,M/S. GOVERNMENT PLEADER 1123

  2. 2.K.M.A.Nijam

  3. 3.N.Venkatesan

  4. 4.Ashrafali

  5. 5.Tamil Nadu

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice P.B. BalajiView PDF

    The court allowed the petitioners' (Superintending Engineer and others) petition to condone a 239-day delay in filing a Second Appeal. The judge found the delay adequately explained in the affidavit and was satisfied with the petitioners' arguments, noting that compensation had already been deposited before trial court. The Second Appeal was directed to be numbered and listed for hearing on 22.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Miscellaneous Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP(MD)/4940/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petitioners' (Superintending Engineer and others) petition to condone a 239-day delay in filing a Second Appeal. The judge found the delay adequately explained in the affidavit and was satisfied with the petitioners' arguments, noting that compensation had already been deposited before trial court. The Second Appeal was directed to be numbered and listed for hearing on 22.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case