S.Jerina Begum vs Sahul Hameed (Died) 1. N.Kamal — CMP(MD)/8323/2025

Case under U/s 5 Limitation Act Section 1684. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.

Next hearing 10-Jul-2026

CNR: HCMD010444152025

Filing Number

CMP(MD)/30908/2025

Filing Date

04-Apr-2025

Registration No

CMP(MD)/8323/2025

Registration Date

03-Jun-2025

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 5 Limitation Act Section 1684

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.Jerina Begum

    Adv. K. MUTHUMALAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sahul Hameed (Died) 1. N.Kamal

    Adv. R2 - TAPAL RETURNED - INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS,R1 - TAPAL RETURNED - DECEASED,-------,PVT. NOTICE - PROOF FILED,R2 - TAPAL RETURNED - INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS,R1 - TAPAL RETURNED - NO SUCH ADDRESSEE,----------- 1123

  2. 2.Mumtaj Begam

Case History

  1. 10-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jul-2026

    Miscellaneous Petitions

    Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice P.B. BalajiView PDF

    Case Summary: CMP(MD)/8323/2025 The court adjourned the case to 10.07.2026. The petitioner's counsel informed the court that the first respondent (Sahul Hameed) has died, and undertook to bring the deceased's legal heirs on record. The court granted the petitioner's request to serve private notice to the counsel who represented the second respondent before the First Appellate Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP(MD)/8323/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMP(MD)/8323/2025 The court adjourned the case to 10.07.2026. The petitioner's counsel informed the court that the first respondent (Sahul Hameed) has died, and undertook to bring the deceased's legal heirs on record. The court granted the petitioner's request to serve private notice to the counsel who represented the second respondent before the First Appellate Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case