M/s.Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Sugars Private Limited, M/s.R.Sivaraman, ,A.MOHAMEDHANEEF,M.Veerapathran Prasanth ,JYOTSNA SIVAKUMAR,WRITTEN SUBMISSION FILED IN USR.NO.6535/26 vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax — WP(MD)/10711/2025

Case under Others Section Others. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010434882025

e-Filing Number

02-04-2025

Filing Number

WP(MD)/30267/2025

Filing Date

03-Apr-2025

Registration No

WP(MD)/10711/2025

Registration Date

15-Apr-2025

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Income Tax ( 87 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section Others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s.Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Sugars Private Limited, M/s.R.Sivaraman, ,A.MOHAMEDHANEEF,M.Veerapathran Prasanth ,JYOTSNA SIVAKUMAR,WRITTEN SUBMISSION FILED IN USR.NO.6535/26

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

    Adv. M/s. N.DILIP KUMAR - 1978/02 (SENIOR ST. COUNSEL FOR INCOME TAX),MEMO OF APPEARANCE FOR R1 & R2 1123

  2. 2.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha ChakravarthyView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: WP(MD) /10711/2025 Court Decision: The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petitions filed by M/s. Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Sugars Private Limited and M/s. V.V. Mineral, holding that assessment orders passed in June 2021 were valid and enforceable despite being initially kept in abeyance pending writ petition disposal. Key Reasoning: The court found that the assessment orders were passed pursuant to court-approved interim orders permitting assessment proceedings to continue, with the tax demand subsequently kept in abeyance pending final judgment. Once the IBS rejected the petitioners' settlement applications in November 2023, the assessment orders automatically came into force, and recovery notices were properly issued in December 2024. The court rejected arguments that the orders were void ab initio, finding jurisdiction was never exclusively vested in the IBS given the orders were received only through extraordinary writ jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Part Heard Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    xxxx

    Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Income Tax Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Income Tax (Nr)

    Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Income Tax Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Mentioned Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy

  9. 25-Jun-2025

    Admission (Income Tax)

    Honourable Mr.Justice Vivek Kumar Singh

  10. 23-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 03-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/10711/2025

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: WP(MD) /10711/2025 Court Decision: The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petitions filed by M/s. Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Sugars Private Limited and M/s. V.V. Mineral, holding that assessment orders passed in June 2021 were valid and enforceable despite being initially kept in abeyance pending writ petition disposal. Key Reasoning: The court found that the assessment orders were passed pursuant to court-approved interim orders permitting assessment proceedings to continue, with the tax demand subsequently kept in abeyance pending final judgment. Once the IBS rejected the petitioners' settlement applications in November 2023, the assessment orders automatically came into force, and recovery notices were properly issued in December 2024. The court rejected arguments that the orders were void ab initio, finding jurisdiction was never exclusively vested in the IBS given the orders were received only through extraordinary writ jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case