M/s.Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Sugars Private Limited, M/s.R.Sivaraman, ,A.MOHAMEDHANEEF,M.Veerapathran Prasanth ,JYOTSNA SIVAKUMAR,WRITTEN SUBMISSION FILED IN USR.NO.6535/26 vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax — WP(MD)/10711/2025
Case under Others Section Others. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 01st June 2026.
CNR: HCMD010434882025
e-Filing Number
02-04-2025
Filing Number
WP(MD)/30267/2025
Filing Date
03-Apr-2025
Registration No
WP(MD)/10711/2025
Registration Date
15-Apr-2025
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Income Tax ( 87 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
01-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s.Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Sugars Private Limited, M/s.R.Sivaraman, ,A.MOHAMEDHANEEF,M.Veerapathran Prasanth ,JYOTSNA SIVAKUMAR,WRITTEN SUBMISSION FILED IN USR.NO.6535/26
Respondent(s)
-
1.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Adv. M/s. N.DILIP KUMAR - 1978/02 (SENIOR ST. COUNSEL FOR INCOME TAX),MEMO OF APPEARANCE FOR R1 & R2 1123
-
2.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha ChakravarthyView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: WP(MD) /10711/2025 Court Decision: The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petitions filed by M/s. Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Sugars Private Limited and M/s. V.V. Mineral, holding that assessment orders passed in June 2021 were valid and enforceable despite being initially kept in abeyance pending writ petition disposal. Key Reasoning: The court found that the assessment orders were passed pursuant to court-approved interim orders permitting assessment proceedings to continue, with the tax demand subsequently kept in abeyance pending final judgment. Once the IBS rejected the petitioners' settlement applications in November 2023, the assessment orders automatically came into force, and recovery notices were properly issued in December 2024. The court rejected arguments that the orders were void ab initio, finding jurisdiction was never exclusively vested in the IBS given the orders were received only through extraordinary writ jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
Part Heard Cases
Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy
-
08-Apr-2026
xxxx
Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy
-
02-Apr-2026
Income Tax Cases
Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy
-
25-Mar-2026
Income Tax (Nr)
Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy
-
09-Mar-2026
Income Tax Cases
Honourable Mr Justice D.bharatha Chakravarthy
-
02-Mar-2026
Mentioned Cases
Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
-
25-Jun-2025
Admission (Income Tax)
Honourable Mr.Justice Vivek Kumar Singh
-
23-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP(MD)/10711/2025
CASE SUMMARY: WP(MD) /10711/2025 Court Decision: The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petitions filed by M/s. Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Sugars Private Limited and M/s. V.V. Mineral, holding that assessment orders passed in June 2021 were valid and enforceable despite being initially kept in abeyance pending writ petition disposal. Key Reasoning: The court found that the assessment orders were passed pursuant to court-approved interim orders permitting assessment proceedings to continue, with the tax demand subsequently kept in abeyance pending final judgment. Once the IBS rejected the petitioners' settlement applications in November 2023, the assessment orders automatically came into force, and recovery notices were properly issued in December 2024. The court rejected arguments that the orders were void ab initio, finding jurisdiction was never exclusively vested in the IBS given the orders were received only through extraordinary writ jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts