Thirumalaikannan vs Bharathan alias Muthuraj, — SA(MD)/159/2025

Case under U/s 100 of C.p.c Section 1659. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010415912025

Filing Number

SA(MD)/28937/2025

Filing Date

01-Apr-2025

Registration No

SA(MD)/159/2025

Registration Date

02-Apr-2025

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Suits ( 149 )

Sub-Category

Mandatory Injunction ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 100 of C.p.c Section 1659

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Thirumalaikannan

    Adv. J.PADHMAAVATHI DEVI

  2. 2.Vimalarani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bharathan alias Muthuraj,

    Adv. M/S. V.ILLANCHEZIAN ,G.MANIKANDAN FOR R12 ,M/S.P.B.AHAMED YASMIN PARVIN,GOVT. ADVOCATE FOR R6 TO R8 ,(VIDE COURT ORDER DT.30.06.

  2. 2.(VAKALAT NOT FILED),M/S.N.DILIP KUMAR,C.MURUGAVEL ,A.V.SANJAI FOR R1 TO R3 & R9 TO R11 ,(R11 - MINOR REP. BY R

  3. 3.,FRESH NOTICE ORDERED ON 18.07.2025 FOR R4 & R5,-----------,R4 - MANIKANDAN,R5 - KANNAN,------,M/S.N.DILIP KUMAR ,VAKALAT (RETURNED) DT 24/10/2025 SR43840 1123

  4. 4.Manimaran

  5. 5.Vellaiyan,

  6. 6.Manikandan

  7. 7.Kannan

  8. 8.The Tahsildar,

  9. 9.The District Collector

  10. 10.The Commissioner,

  11. 11.Jeyalakshmi

  12. 12.Dinesh

  13. 13.Minor. Nithesh

  14. 14.Ramakrishnan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice P.B. BalajiView PDF

    Case Summary The Madras High Court dismissed a second appeal challenging a lower court's decree for property recovery. The court held that defendants (heirs of Maruthammal) were estopped from challenging a 1966 Will's validity since Maruthammal herself had relied on the same Will in an earlier successful suit, and therefore could not later dispute its genuineness. The court also rejected arguments that a Hindu woman's limited estate rights should have expanded into absolute ownership, finding Section 14(2) of the Hindu Succession Act barred such claims where the Will explicitly prescribed restricted rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

  4. 21-Jan-2026

    Miscellaneous Petitions

    Honourable Mr Justice K.murali Shankar

  5. 18-Dec-2025

    xoxoxoxoxox

    Honourable Mr Justice P.vadamalai

  6. 28-Nov-2025

    Honourable Mr Justice P.vadamalaiView PDF

  7. 17-Nov-2025

    Final Hearing Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice P.vadamalai

  8. 24-Oct-2025

    Honourable Mr Justice P.vadamalaiView PDF

  9. 24-Oct-2025

    Final Hearing Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice P.vadamalai

  10. 22-Sep-2025

    Honourable Mr Justice P.vadamalaiView PDF

  11. 11-Aug-2025

    Honourable Dr.Justice A.d.maria CleteView PDF

  12. 11-Aug-2025

    Adjourned Cases

    Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

  13. 18-Jul-2025

    Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF

  14. 18-Jul-2025

    Adjourned Cases

    Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

  15. 30-Jun-2025

    Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF

  16. 30-Jun-2025

    Date Cases

    Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

  17. 18-Jun-2025

    Letter Given Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan

  18. 03-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 01-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA(MD)/159/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Madras High Court dismissed a second appeal challenging a lower court's decree for property recovery. The court held that defendants (heirs of Maruthammal) were estopped from challenging a 1966 Will's validity since Maruthammal herself had relied on the same Will in an earlier successful suit, and therefore could not later dispute its genuineness. The court also rejected arguments that a Hindu woman's limited estate rights should have expanded into absolute ownership, finding Section 14(2) of the Hindu Succession Act barred such claims where the Will explicitly prescribed restricted rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case