S.Naveen M/s.Ajmal Associates, A.Arumugam ,V. GEORGE RAJA,ADDL. TYPED SET FILED USR. 3545 DT 28.01.2026 vs M.Nitharshani — CMA(MD)/696/2024

Case under U/s 19(1) of Family Court Act Section 1924. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010358652024

Filing Number

CMA(MD)/25119/2024

Filing Date

26-Mar-2024

Registration No

CMA(MD)/696/2024

Registration Date

24-Jun-2024

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh , Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh , Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL ( 167 )

Sub-Category

S. 19 of the Family Court Act 1984. ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 19(1) of Family Court Act Section 1924

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.Naveen M/s.Ajmal Associates, A.Arumugam ,V. GEORGE RAJA,ADDL. TYPED SET FILED USR. 3545 DT 28.01.2026

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M.Nitharshani

    Adv. G.MANIKANDAN ,FOR SOLE RESPONDENT SR.26086 DT.25.07.2024 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand VENKATESH,Honourable Mr Justice K.K. RamakrishnanView PDF

    Summary: S. Naveen v. M. Nitharshani (CMA(MD)/696/2024) Court: Madurai Bench, Madras High Court Date: June 15, 2026 Decision The High Court dismissed the husband's appeals for divorce and upheld the wife's decree for restitution of conjugal rights. The court found the husband's allegations of schizophrenia against the wife entirely unsubstantiated by medical evidence. Key Findings On Mental Illness Allegations: - No credible medical evidence established the wife suffered from schizophrenia or any incurable mental disorder - Medical records were only photocopies of prescriptions lacking diagnostic reports - The alleged mental illness emerged only after pregnancy confirmation; the couple lived harmoniously for 8 months prior - The court found the schizophrenia allegations to be a calculated fabrication designed to facilitate divorce On Cruelty: The husband failed to plead or prove any specific abnormal conduct by the wife constituting cruelty. The mere unsubstantiated allegation of mental illness, without supporting evidence or demonstrated behavioral impact, cannot ground divorce. On Separation Arguments: The court rejected that six years of separation alone constitutes mental cruelty, particularly where the separation resulted from the husband's unilateral withdrawal based on unfounded apprehensions. A spouse cannot create the breakdown and then exploit it as grounds for divorce. Outcome - Divorce petition: Dismissed - Restitution of conjugal rights: Confirmed in wife's favor - Jewellery: 40 sovereigns to be returned (confirmed) - Mangalsutra: Direction to return set aside as inconsistent with restitution decree This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    oOo

    Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh , Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Final Hearing Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh , Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Cma - Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh , Honourable Mr. Justice P.dhanabal

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    For Reporting Settlement

    Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan , Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Cma - Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan , Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Adjourned Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan , Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

  9. 08-Jan-2026

    Cma -- Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan , Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

  10. 23-Jan-2025

    Cma - Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice G.r.swaminathan , Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

  11. 09-Jan-2025

    Cma - Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice G.r.swaminathan , Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

  12. 02-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 26-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMA(MD)/696/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: S. Naveen v. M. Nitharshani (CMA(MD)/696/2024) Court: Madurai Bench, Madras High Court Date: June 15, 2026 Decision The High Court dismissed the husband's appeals for divorce and upheld the wife's decree for restitution of conjugal rights. The court found the husband's allegations of schizophrenia against the wife entirely unsubstantiated by medical evidence. Key Findings On Mental Illness Allegations: - No credible medical evidence established the wife suffered from schizophrenia or any incurable mental disorder - Medical records were only photocopies of prescriptions lacking diagnostic reports - The alleged mental illness emerged only after pregnancy confirmation; the couple lived harmoniously for 8 months prior - The court found the schizophrenia allegations to be a calculated fabrication designed to facilitate divorce On Cruelty: The husband failed to plead or prove any specific abnormal conduct by the wife constituting cruelty. The mere unsubstantiated allegation of mental illness, without supporting evidence or demonstrated behavioral impact, cannot ground divorce. On Separation Arguments: The court rejected that six years of separation alone constitutes mental cruelty, particularly where the separation resulted from the husband's unilateral withdrawal based on unfounded apprehensions. A spouse cannot create the breakdown and then exploit it as grounds for divorce. Outcome - Divorce petition: Dismissed - Restitution of conjugal rights: Confirmed in wife's favor - Jewellery: 40 sovereigns to be returned (confirmed) - Mangalsutra: Direction to return set aside as inconsistent with restitution decree This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case