Irulappapandiyan vs The District Collector — WP(MD)/9285/2026
Case under Others Section others. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.
CNR: HCMD010322382026
Filing Number
WP(MD)/19522/2026
Filing Date
03-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP(MD)/9285/2026
Registration Date
01-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Mrs Justice S.srimathy
Coram
Honourable Mrs Justice S.srimathy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Land Ceiling/Reforms/Disputes/Abolitions and Conversion/Encroachment ( 97 )
Sub-Category
The Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Act (4 of 1986) ( 19 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
02-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Irulappapandiyan
Adv. M.SANKAR,M.BALASUBRAMANYAM,M.BALASUBRAMANYAM, C.ILANKALEESWARAN,P.PANDI MEENA,ANBUCHEZHIAN S,M.BALASUBRAMANYAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.The District Collector
Adv. A. CHARUMATHI – 513/22 FOR R4 & R5,G. RADHAKRISHNAN – 906/07,T. RAMASAMY - 2054/04,M/s. ANANTH C RAJESH – 1106/93 1123
-
2.The Tahsildar,
-
3.The Surveyor,
-
4.Saravanan,
-
5.Muthuraj,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jun-2026
Honourable Mrs Justice S.srimathyView PDF
The Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) disposed of the writ petition with directions to the Tahsildar to reconsider the petitioner's representation regarding land patta (title deed) cancellation. The court found that the patta was transferred to respondents 4 and 5 without issuing notice to the petitioner, who claims title through a 1938 court judgment, and directed the Tahsildar to hear all parties including rival claimants and pass appropriate orders within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
For Admission
Honourable Mrs Justice S.srimathy
-
07-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(MD)/9285/2026
The Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) disposed of the writ petition with directions to the Tahsildar to reconsider the petitioner's representation regarding land patta (title deed) cancellation. The court found that the patta was transferred to respondents 4 and 5 without issuing notice to the petitioner, who claims title through a 1938 court judgment, and directed the Tahsildar to hear all parties including rival claimants and pass appropriate orders within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts