The Branch Manager vs Subbiah — CMP(MD)/2633/2026

Case under U/s 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act,1988 Section 173. Disposed: Uncontested--ORDERED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010249832026

Filing Number

CMP(MD)/14868/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

CMP(MD)/2633/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice K.murali Shankar

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice K.murali Shankar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ORDERED

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act,1988 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Branch Manager

    Adv. M.E.ILANGO,P.K.M.ANDAL PADMINI,P.K.M.ANDAL PADMINI, ,M.JERIN MATHEW,P.K.M.ANDAL PADMINI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Subbiah

    Adv. K.LOGANATHAN ,G.KANDHAVADVELAN FOR R1 ,DT 02/04/2026 SR13490,COURT NOTICE,---------,R2 - SELVAM 1123

  2. 2.Selvam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice K.murali ShankarView PDF

    The court accepted the petitioner's compliance with its earlier direction by recording the cost memo of Rs.750/- paid by the petitioner's counsel. The court condoned the delay and directed the Registry to number the appeal and list the matter for hearing in the usual course, provided all other requirements were satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Miscellaneous Petitions

    Honourable Mr Justice K.murali Shankar

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice K.murali ShankarView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Miscellaneous Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice K.murali Shankar

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice K.murali ShankarView PDF

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP(MD)/2633/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court accepted the petitioner's compliance with its earlier direction by recording the cost memo of Rs.750/- paid by the petitioner's counsel. The court condoned the delay and directed the Registry to number the appeal and list the matter for hearing in the usual course, provided all other requirements were satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case