THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, M/S. G. PRABHU RAJADURAI , I. Robert Chandrakumar vs KATHIRESAN, — CMA(MD)/21/2021

Case under U/s 173 of Motor Vehicle Act Section 1665. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010022082020

Filing Number

CMA(MD)/1444/2020

Filing Date

07-Jan-2020

Registration No

CMA(MD)/21/2021

Registration Date

11-Jan-2021

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh , Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh , Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL ( 167 )

Sub-Category

S. 173 of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Act ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 173 of Motor Vehicle Act Section 1665

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, M/S. G. PRABHU RAJADURAI , I. Robert Chandrakumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KATHIRESAN,

    Adv. CAVEATOR FOR R1,M/S. V. SAKTHIVEL FOR R3 & R5,VAKALAT FILED SR10866 DT.28.04.2021,COURT NOTICE ,------------,R4 - ERATTAYASAMY,R7 - A.C.KOTEESWARAN,R2 - TAPAL RETURNED WITH AN ENDORSEMENT - NO SUCH ADDRESSEE ,R6 - TAPAL NOT YET RETURNED ,FRESH PVT. NOTICE TO UNSERVED RESPONDENTS ORDERED ON 18/02/2021,------------,PROOF FILED USR.4786,R2 - TAPAL RETURNED - NO SUCH ADDRESSEE,R6 - TPAL RETURNED - REFUSED 1123

  2. 2.Meenakshi Sundaram,

  3. 3.The Divisional Manager,

  4. 4.Erattayasamy,

  5. 5.The Divisional Manager,

  6. 6.K. Venkateswaran,

  7. 7.A.C.Koteeswaran,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand VENKATESH,Honourable Mr Justice K.K. RamakrishnanView PDF

    Summary The Madurai High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeals challenging liability in two motor accident claims involving a son and father injured in successive accidents on December 5, 2014. The court upheld that the son's catastrophic spinal cord injury—resulting in permanent paralysis, immobility, and complete functional disability requiring feeding through a tracheostomy tube—was sustained in the second accident, not the first, thereby confirming the insurer's liability. Additionally, the court enhanced the son's compensation from Rs. 33,02,600 to Rs. 57,98,000 with 7.5% interest, accounting for attendant charges, pain and suffering, amenities loss, and future medical expenses, recognizing his vegetative state warranted just and adequate relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    xoxoxoxoxox

    Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh , Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    xoxoxoxoxox

    Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh , Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan

  5. 18-Feb-2021

    For Admission

    Honourable Mrs Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana , Honourable Mrs Justice S.kannammal

  6. 22-Jan-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Jan-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMA(MD)/21/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Madurai High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeals challenging liability in two motor accident claims involving a son and father injured in successive accidents on December 5, 2014. The court upheld that the son's catastrophic spinal cord injury—resulting in permanent paralysis, immobility, and complete functional disability requiring feeding through a tracheostomy tube—was sustained in the second accident, not the first, thereby confirming the insurer's liability. Additionally, the court enhanced the son's compensation from Rs. 33,02,600 to Rs. 57,98,000 with 7.5% interest, accounting for attendant charges, pain and suffering, amenities loss, and future medical expenses, recognizing his vegetative state warranted just and adequate relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case