Sivasankaran vs D.Vijayakumar — CMP/13388/2026

Case under R/w Order 41 Rule 19 Cpc Section 1. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA013196852018

Filing Number

CMP/60048/2018

Filing Date

02-Aug-2018

Registration No

CMP/13388/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan , Honourable Mr.Justice K.rajasekar

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan , Honourable Mr.Justice K.rajasekar

Bench Type

Division Bench

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

R/w Order 41 Rule 19 Cpc Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sivasankaran

    Adv. Srimathi V.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.D.Vijayakumar

  2. 2.M.R.Dhanaraj

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice C.V. KARTHIKEYAN,Honourable Mr.Justice K.rajasekarView PDF

    The Madras High Court allowed Sivasankaran's petitions to restore an appeal in a specific performance suit that had been dismissed on 01.12.2016 for non-payment of batta (court fees). The court found that the previously imposed condition for condonement of delay had been satisfied and held it appropriate to adjudicate the issues on merits. The appeal was restored to file with records to be called from the trial court and hearing scheduled for 22.06.2026, with any execution proceedings by the decree holder made subject to the final appeal order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Miscellaneous Petitions - As

    Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan , Honourable Mr.Justice K.rajasekar

  4. 02-Aug-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/13388/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court allowed Sivasankaran's petitions to restore an appeal in a specific performance suit that had been dismissed on 01.12.2016 for non-payment of batta (court fees). The court found that the previously imposed condition for condonement of delay had been satisfied and held it appropriate to adjudicate the issues on merits. The appeal was restored to file with records to be called from the trial court and hearing scheduled for 22.06.2026, with any execution proceedings by the decree holder made subject to the final appeal order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case