THE DGM (T) AND PROJECT DIRECTOR SRINIVASAN SU vs The District Collector And Sole Arbitrator (LA) — CMP/13246/2026

Case under U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DELAY CONDONED on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA012988432025

Filing Number

CMP/200286/2025

Filing Date

04-Dec-2025

Registration No

CMP/13246/2026

Registration Date

21-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan , Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan , Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi

Bench Type

Division Bench

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DELAY CONDONED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE DGM (T) AND PROJECT DIRECTOR SRINIVASAN SU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The District Collector And Sole Arbitrator (LA)

  2. 2.The Competent Authority and Special District Revenue Officer (LA)

  3. 3.K.Sivasubramaniam Spinners Private Ltd

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN,Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan ThilakavadiView PDF

    The court granted the petitioner's miscellaneous petition to condone a 447-day delay in re-presenting appeal papers in Arbitration Appeal SR.No.199396 of 2025, finding the reasons provided in the supporting affidavit satisfactory. The Registry was directed to proceed with numbering the appeal if otherwise in order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    To Condone Delay In Representation

    Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan , Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi

  4. 04-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/13246/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the petitioner's miscellaneous petition to condone a 447-day delay in re-presenting appeal papers in Arbitration Appeal SR.No.199396 of 2025, finding the reasons provided in the supporting affidavit satisfactory. The Registry was directed to proceed with numbering the appeal if otherwise in order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case