Genrobotic Innovations Private Limited, M/S. NAVARRE EBENEZER ROY, MOHIT PORWAL, RAHUL BAGGA,J.AISHVARIYA, AFRINA IDAAYATH, vs Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs, — CMA(PT)/16/2026
Case under U/s 117a of the Patents Act, 1970 Read with the Tribunals Reforms and Rationalisation and Conditions of Service Ordinance, 2021 Section 1. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCMA012727872025
Filing Number
CMA(PT)/181533/2025
Filing Date
06-Nov-2025
Registration No
CMA(PT)/16/2026
Registration Date
15-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu
Coram
Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL ( 167 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIALSECTION
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Genrobotic Innovations Private Limited, M/S. NAVARRE EBENEZER ROY, MOHIT PORWAL, RAHUL BAGGA,J.AISHVARIYA, AFRINA IDAAYATH,
Respondent(s)
-
1.Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs,
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh BabuView PDF
Case Summary: CMA(PT)/16/2026 The petition filed by Genrobotic Innovations Private Limited and others against the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs was admitted by Justice K. Kumaresh Babu. Notice to the respondent was issued returnable in four weeks, with permission granted to the petitioner's counsel to serve notice on the Standing Counsel for the respondent. The matter was adjourned for listing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
For Admission
Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu
-
06-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CMA(PT)/16/2026
Case Summary: CMA(PT)/16/2026 The petition filed by Genrobotic Innovations Private Limited and others against the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs was admitted by Justice K. Kumaresh Babu. Notice to the respondent was issued returnable in four weeks, with permission granted to the petitioner's counsel to serve notice on the Standing Counsel for the respondent. The matter was adjourned for listing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts