The Director General of Police, STATE GOVERNMENT PLEADER vs M.Ravi — CMP/28075/2025

Case under U/s 5 Limitation Act Section 1. Disposed: Contested--ORDERED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA012692012025

Filing Number

CMP/178900/2025

Filing Date

04-Nov-2025

Registration No

CMP/28075/2025

Registration Date

10-Nov-2025

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar , Honourable Mr.Justice N.senthilkumar

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar , Honourable Mr.Justice N.senthilkumar

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ORDERED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 5 Limitation Act Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Director General of Police, STATE GOVERNMENT PLEADER

  2. 2.The Commissioner

  3. 3.The Commissioner of Police,

  4. 4.The Additional Commissioner of Police

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M.Ravi

    Adv. S.PRIAN ADARSH FOR SOLE RESPONDENT,A.HARSH DUGAR 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice R. Suresh KUMAR,Honourable Mr.Justice N.senthilkumarView PDF

    The Madras High Court granted condonation of a 229-day delay in filing an appeal, finding the reasons provided in the supporting affidavit satisfactory and noting no serious objections from the respondent. The petition for condonation was accordingly allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice R. Suresh KUMAR,Honourable Mr.Justice N.senthilkumarView PDF

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    To Condone Delay In Filing

    Honourable Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar , Honourable Mr.Justice N.senthilkumar

  5. 04-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/28075/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court granted condonation of a 229-day delay in filing an appeal, finding the reasons provided in the supporting affidavit satisfactory and noting no serious objections from the respondent. The petition for condonation was accordingly allowed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case