IDEN ISAN vs THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU — WP/36701/2024
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: --CLOSED on 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA012254712024
Filing Number
WP/162045/2024
Filing Date
28-Nov-2024
Registration No
WP/36701/2024
Registration Date
29-Nov-2024
Judge
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
Coram
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Service ( 140 )
Sub-Category
Appointment ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
08-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
--CLOSED
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.IDEN ISAN
Adv. Suhrith Parthasarathy,ARUN KARTHIK MOHAN ,ARUN KARTHIK MOHAN , GAYATHRI.G ,HARSHAVARDAN.R ,AMRITHA SATHYAJITH ,ASHWINI VAIDIALINGAM,ARUN KARTHIK MOHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU
Adv. PVT NOTICE PERMITTED, PROOF NOT FILED,M/S.C.SIVAKUMAR-, A. MOHAMED ISMAIL, N. VINOTHINI FOR R3 DT. 17/12/24 1123
-
2.DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION,
-
3.G.KRISHNARAJA,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF
The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking a Quo Warranto against G. Krishnaraja as Director of Prosecution on the ground that he had been terminated from the position, rendering the petition infructuous. No costs were awarded and the interim application was closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
Specially Ordered Cases
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
-
01-Apr-2026
Specially Ordered Cases
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
-
28-Jan-2025
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Honourable Mrs Justice V.bhavani Subbaroyan
-
19-Dec-2024
For Admission
Honourable Mrs Justice V.bhavani Subbaroyan
-
03-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. WP/36701/2024
The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking a Quo Warranto against G. Krishnaraja as Director of Prosecution on the ground that he had been terminated from the position, rendering the petition infructuous. No costs were awarded and the interim application was closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts