JOTHIBOSS M/S.R. MEENAL, G.INDIRA,T.SEZHIAN vs MANNANKATTI (DIED) 1. DHANALAKSHMI — CMP/26253/2024

Case under U/o 22 Rule 4 C.p.c Section 1. Disposed: Contested--ORDERED on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011806092024

Filing Number

CMP/130184/2024

Filing Date

25-Sep-2024

Registration No

CMP/26253/2024

Registration Date

18-Nov-2024

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice K.rajasekar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice K.rajasekar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ORDERED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o 22 Rule 4 C.p.c Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JOTHIBOSS M/S.R. MEENAL, G.INDIRA,T.SEZHIAN

  2. 2.ANBAZHAGAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANNANKATTI (DIED) 1. DHANALAKSHMI

  2. 2.PONNAPPAN

  3. 3.VIJAYABALAN

  4. 4.PUSHPARANI

  5. 5.VARSHA

  6. 6.HEMA

  7. 7.JEGAN

  8. 8.PERUMAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice K.rajasekarView PDF

    The Madras High Court granted two Civil Miscellaneous Petitions filed by Jothiboss and Anbazhagan to add the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent (Mannankatti) as respondents 4-8 in the underlying Civil Revision Petition, and to record Dhanalakshmi as a legal representative. The court, being satisfied with the reasons in supporting affidavits, approved both petitions and directed the Registry to amend the cause-title accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Miscellaneous Petitions

    Honourable Mr.Justice K.rajasekar

  4. 25-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/26253/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court granted two Civil Miscellaneous Petitions filed by Jothiboss and Anbazhagan to add the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent (Mannankatti) as respondents 4-8 in the underlying Civil Revision Petition, and to record Dhanalakshmi as a legal representative. The court, being satisfied with the reasons in supporting affidavits, approved both petitions and directed the Registry to amend the cause-title accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case