JOTHIBOSS M/S.R. MEENAL, G.INDIRA,T.SEZHIAN vs MANNANKATTI (DIED) 1. DHANALAKSHMI — CMP/26253/2024
Case under U/o 22 Rule 4 C.p.c Section 1. Disposed: Contested--ORDERED on 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA011806092024
Filing Number
CMP/130184/2024
Filing Date
25-09-2024
Registration No
CMP/26253/2024
Registration Date
18-11-2024
Judge
Honourable Mr.Justice K.RAJASEKAR
Coram
Honourable Mr.Justice K.RAJASEKAR
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
JUDICIALSECTION
Decision Date
08th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ORDERED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JOTHIBOSS M/S.R. MEENAL, G.INDIRA,T.SEZHIAN
ANBAZHAGAN
Respondent(s)
MANNANKATTI (DIED) 1. DHANALAKSHMI
PONNAPPAN
VIJAYABALAN
PUSHPARANI
VARSHA
HEMA
JEGAN
PERUMAL
Hearing History
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice K.RAJASEKAR
MISCELLANEOUS PETITIONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | MISCELLANEOUS PETITIONS |
Orders
The Madras High Court granted two Civil Miscellaneous Petitions filed by Jothiboss and Anbazhagan to add the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent (Mannankatti) as respondents 4-8 in the underlying Civil Revision Petition, and to record Dhanalakshmi as a legal representative. The court, being satisfied with the reasons in supporting affidavits, approved both petitions and directed the Registry to amend the cause-title accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Madras High Court granted two Civil Miscellaneous Petitions filed by Jothiboss and Anbazhagan to add the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent (Mannankatti) as respondents 4-8 in the underlying Civil Revision Petition, and to record Dhanalakshmi as a legal representative. The court, being satisfied with the reasons in supporting affidavits, approved both petitions and directed the Registry to amend the cause-title accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts