JOTHIBOSS M/S.R. MEENAL, G.INDIRA,T.SEZHIAN vs MANNANKATTI (DIED) 1. DHANALAKSHMI — CMP/26205/2024

Case under U/o 22 Rule 4 C.p.c Section 1. Disposed: --ORDERED on 08th June 2026.

CNR: HCMA011806052024

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CMP/130180/2024

Filing Date

25-09-2024

Registration No

CMP/26205/2024

Registration Date

15-11-2024

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice K.RAJASEKAR

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice K.RAJASEKAR

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

08th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

--ORDERED

Acts & Sections

U/o 22 Rule 4 C.p.c Section 1

Petitioner(s)

JOTHIBOSS M/S.R. MEENAL, G.INDIRA,T.SEZHIAN

ANBAZHAGAN

Respondent(s)

MANNANKATTI (DIED) 1. DHANALAKSHMI

PONNAPPAN

VIJAYABALAN

PUSHPARANI

VARSHA

HEMA

JEGAN

PERUMAL

Orders

08-06-2026
Honourable Mr.Justice K.RAJASEKAR

The High Court of Madras granted both civil miscellaneous petitions, allowing the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent (Pushparani, Varsha, Hema, Jegan, and Perumal) to be added as respondents 4-8 in the underlying civil revision petition, and recording Dhanalakshmi as a legal representative. The court found sufficient grounds in the supporting affidavits and directed the registry to amend the cause-title accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Madras granted both civil miscellaneous petitions, allowing the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent (Pushparani, Varsha, Hema, Jegan, and Perumal) to be added as respondents 4-8 in the underlying civil revision petition, and recording Dhanalakshmi as a legal representative. The court found sufficient grounds in the supporting affidavits and directed the registry to amend the cause-title accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case