SUMATHI @ SUMITHRADEVI vs MUTHUKUMAR — CRP/2974/2021
Case under U/a 227 Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA011645182021
Filing Number
CRP/116068/2021
Filing Date
20-Dec-2021
Registration No
CRP/2974/2021
Registration Date
21-Dec-2021
Judge
Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu
Coram
Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Civil Revision Petition ( 166 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIALSECTION
Decision Date
05-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUMATHI @ SUMITHRADEVI
Adv. J.Ravikumar,G.RAJESH,G.RAJESH, R.NAVEEN SRINIVASAN,R.CHANDRASEKAR,G.RAJESH
-
2.SENATHIPATHI
-
3.M.KUMARIVINOTHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUTHUKUMAR
Adv. R4 - ADDRESSEE NOT AVAILABLE ,R3 - UNCLAIMED ,R10 - DIED VIDE BATTA ,R6 - DOOR LOCKED ,RR2, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12 AND 13 - SERVED ON 03/01/2022,R11 - ITEM DELIVERED ON 29/12/2021,-----------------,PRIVATE NOTICE ,AS LRS OF THE DECEASED REG R10.,R10 - DIED (STEPS DUE TO BRING ON RECORD ,II BATTA DUE REG RR3 TO 4,R-13 ABINAYA MALINI D/O.VARADHARAJ, VINAYAGARKOVIL ST, BAGAVATHIPOALAYAM, KINATHUKADAVU TK, COIMBATORE DIST. ,R-12 VARADHARAJ S/O.KRISHNASAMY, VINAYAGARKOVIL ST, BAGAVATHIPOALAYAM, KINATHUKADAVU TK COIMBATORE DIST. ,R-11 JOTHIMANI W/O.PALANISAMY, S.NAGOOR, POLLACHI TK. ,R-9 P.SIVAKUMAR S/O.PERIYADURAISAMY GOUNDER, PERUMPATHI, Z.KALIAPURAM POST, POLLACHI TK. ,R-8 MURUGANANDHAM S/O.PERIYADURAISAMY GOUNDER, PERUMPATHI, Z.KALIAPURAM POST, POLLACHI TK. ,R-7 SIVAKUMAR S/O.LATE.NANJAPPADEVAR, NO.1/280D, MAIN ROAD, RAMAPATTINAM, POLLACHI TK. ,R-6 GOPALAKRISHNAN S/O.LATE MUTHUSAMY, NO.68/8D, MAIN ROAD, RAMAPATTINAM, POLLACHI TK, ,R-5 DHANALAKSHMI W/O.SAKARANARAYANAN, NO.20, KAMARAJAR ST, MAHALINGAPURAM, POLLACHI. ,K.P.SURESH KUMAR FOR RR1 AND R2,S.UMA MAHESWARI,N.C.ASHOK KUMAR 1123
-
2.SHANMUGASUNDARAM
-
3.MUTHUKRISHNAN
-
4.PARANTHAMAN
-
5.DHANALAKSHMI
-
6.GOPALAKRISHNAN
-
7.SIVAKUMAR
-
8.MURUGANANDHAM
-
9.P.SIVAKUMAR
-
10.SHANMUGAPRIYA
-
11.JOTHIMANI
-
12.VARADHARAJ
-
13.ABINAYA MALINI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh BabuView PDF
Case Summary: CRP 2974/2021 The Madras High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition filed by Sumathi, Senathipathi, and M. Kumarivinotha against a suit (OS 278/2021) filed by respondents seeking declaration and injunction over property. The court held that petitioners must pursue their challenge through Order VII Rule 11 CPC (striking off the plaint) rather than supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, as specific statutory remedies are available and constitute a near-total bar to High Court intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Date Case
Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu
-
08-Apr-2026
Date Case
Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu
-
01-Apr-2026
CRP - Cases
Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu
-
06-Aug-2024
CRP - Cases
Honourable Mr.Justice Battu Devanand
-
16-Jul-2024
CRP - Cases
Honourable Mr.Justice Battu Devanand
-
08-Jul-2024
CRP - Cases
Honourable Mr.Justice Battu Devanand
-
10-Jun-2024
CRP - Cases
Honourable Mr.Justice Battu Devanand
-
02-Apr-2024
CRP - Cases
Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar
-
19-Mar-2024
CRP - Cases
Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar
-
12-Mar-2024
CRP - Cases
Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar
-
29-Feb-2024
CRP - Cases
Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar
-
15-Feb-2024
==============================
Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar
-
27-Jan-2022
For Admission
Honourable Mr Justice R. Subramanian
-
22-Dec-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Dec-2021
Case filed
Registration No. CRP/2974/2021
Case Summary: CRP 2974/2021 The Madras High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition filed by Sumathi, Senathipathi, and M. Kumarivinotha against a suit (OS 278/2021) filed by respondents seeking declaration and injunction over property. The court held that petitioners must pursue their challenge through Order VII Rule 11 CPC (striking off the plaint) rather than supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, as specific statutory remedies are available and constitute a near-total bar to High Court intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts